Wie man eine Globalgeschichte schreibt. Replik auf Harald Kleinschmidt
Seiten 153 - 191
DOI https://doi.org/10.13173/GG.3.2.153
This reply to Kleinschmidt’s critique engages with the major points that he raises. More generally, it summarizes the critical reception of the author’s global history of the early modern period and outlines his approach to the field. The points covered here include theory and method, the suitability of the label “early modern”, the role of Europe, as well as questions of style and composition.